Catherine Merridale's 'Red Fortress' reads like a mediocre attempt at
pop history. Unlike some historians who score a win with their
rehashing of well known ideas, facts, and histories that's made
accessible to a public eager for scraps of information historians find
mundane and banal, 'Red Fortress' seems to be a failure on both counts.
Merridale provides just enough information to make this text a chore
for the average reader while avoiding any type of original conclusions
or arguments. The usual suspects have their fair share of space devoted
to them (Ivan the Terrible, Peter the Great, Catherine the Great, etc.)
and while the Kremlin continually features as either the main 'player'
or in the background of the narrative, it does so to the detriment of
the story being told. Like those top-down histories that concentrate on
kings and queens, politicians and diplomats, military commanders and
revolutionaries, 'Red Fortress' ignores the periphery to concentrate on
the center and adds little to nothing to the history of Russia while
managing to omit much that made Russia what it was and is. As an
introduction to Russian history this is a mediocre effort and
unfortunately I can't imagine it being a useful fit for any other role.
No comments:
Post a Comment